ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction In patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, conservative interventions with extended medical trials are often attempted prior to procedural treatment. Balloon sinuplasty (BSP) is an established procedure for symptomatic relief from chronic rhinosinusitis. However, data suggesting the suboptimal efficacy of prolonged medication management trials, prior to BSP, is lacking. Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of prolonged medication management trials, prior to BSP, for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Methods A retrospective review was performed for all adults with chronic rhinosinusitis who received extended medical management prior to their BSP at two outpatient clinics, from November 1, 2013, to June 31, 2018. The patients' Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT) scores were compared between baseline, post-medication trials, and post-BSP. Results The SNOT scores of a total of 64 patients were collected. Overall, patients showed a significant worsening of symptoms during the medication management trials from baseline (p = 0.002126) but significant improvement of symptoms after undergoing BSP (p < 0.0001). Conclusions The patient symptom burden worsened and prolonged during medication management trials. The BSP procedure alone showed significant improvement in the quality of life for chronic rhinosinusitis patients, when considering their SNOT scores. The worsening of patients' symptoms during medication management may invalidate the necessity of prolonged medication management trials.
ABSTRACT
Apesar da importância de praticar o atendimento de saúde baseado em evidências, os cirurgiões ortopedistas têm direcionado poucos esforços para gerar essas evidências. Mesmo quando presente, a evidência publicada é falha quanto ao rigor metodológico e sabe-se que é imprecisa. Um dos principais motivos para a falta de geração de evidências de qualidade é o baixo envolvimento dos cirurgiões ortopedistas na pesquisa e a falta de ambientes de treinamento estruturados em pesquisa, onde eles possam aprender conceitos, assim como aprimorar suas habilidades em pesquisa. Existe a necessidade de uma abordagem objetiva que possa equipar os cirurgiões ortopedistas com métodos eficientes para transitarem da pesquisa para a escrita. Descrevemos um programa pragmático de treinamento em pesquisa, planejado e desenvolvido pelo grupo de Pesquisa sobre Pesquisa, que visa montar uma rede global de pesquisadores ortopedistas treinados em métodos de pesquisa funcionais e padronizados. Também fornecemos um rápido panorama sobre os princípios do curso e suas ferramentas, assim como plataformas usadas nesse programa.
Despite the importance of delivering evidence-based health care, orthopedic surgeons have directed fewer efforts towards the generation of such evidence. Even when present, published evidence lacks methodological rigor and is known to be inaccurate. One of the main reasons for the lack of generation of quality evidence, and the low involvement in research among orthopedic surgeons, is the lack of structured research coaching environments where they can learn concepts and hone their research skills. There is a palpable need for a pragmatic and outcome-oriented approach that can equip orthopedic surgeons with effective ways of communicating their research in writing. We describe a pragmatic research coaching program, designed and developed by the Research on Research group, which aims to build a global network of orthopedic researchers trained in streamlined and standardized research methods. We also provide a brief overview of the course principles and tools, and the platforms used in this program.